The Role of Social Influence and Self-Discrepancy in Decision Making: A Fictional Narrative

1. Introduction:

It is generally agreed that human beings are social animals. We are Results shown that people make better decisions when they are supported by others, especially ones with expertise in the domain (Allan, 2008). However, some decision making situations call upon us to go against the grain and exert our independence. These situations can be difficult, and sometimes the stakes are high. The fictional narrative below exhibits such a situation. In it, Alan is faced with a decision that will have major implications for his family. He must choose between two courses of action, both of which have significant risks. Allan must decide whether to take the safer route, which is supported by his family, or to pursue a more risky course of action that he feels is best for his family. This decision is made all the more difficult by the fact that Alan’s wife is pregnant and he has young children. The outcome of Alan’s decision will have far-reaching consequences for his family, and so it is not one to be taken lightly.

2. Theoretical perspective of the fictional narrative:

The fictional narrative can be analyzed from different theoretical perspectives. One such perspective is the social influence perspective. From this perspective, the decision that Alan makes can be seen as being influenced by the people around him. His family members are urging him to take the safe route, while he feels that the more risky course of action is best for his family. Another perspective that can be used to analyze the situation is the self-discrepancy theory. This theory posits that people are motivated to reduce the discrepancy between their ideal selves and their actual selves. In this case, Alan may be motivated to take the more risky course of action because it aligns with his ideal self. He may feel that this is the best way to provide for his family and protect them from harm. Finally, the decision can also be seen from a cognitive perspective. Alan is trying to weigh the pros and cons of each option and make the best decision for his family. He is taking into consideration the risks and benefits of each option before making a decision.

3. Discussion:

The fictional narrative exhibits quite a number of alluded psychological concepts. These concepts are categorically discussed in terms of the general perspective. Firstly, it can be said that Allan’s decision making process was significantly influenced by social factors. His family members were urging him to take the safe route, while he felt that the more risky course of action was best for his family. This highlights the importance of social influences on decision making. It has been shown that people are more likely to make better decisions when they are supported by others (Allan, 2008). In this case, Alan’s family members were acting as a support system for him and providing him with information that he may not have had access to otherwise. However, they were also pressuring him to make a certain decision, which made the situation more difficult for him. Another factor that played a role in Allan’s decision making process was self-discrepancy theory. This theory posits that people are motivated to reduce the discrepancy between their ideal selves and their actual selves (Higgins, 1987). In this case, Alan may have been motivated to take the more risky course of action because it aligned with his ideal self. He may have felt that this was the best way to provide for his family and protect them from harm. Finally, Allan’s decision making process can also be seen from a cognitive perspective. He was trying to weigh the pros and cons of each option and make the best decision for his family. He was taking into consideration the risks and benefits of each option before making a decision. This highlights the importance of careful deliberation and consideration when making decisions.

4. Conclusion:

In conclusion, the fictional narrative exhibits quite a number of alluded psychological concepts. These concepts are categorically discussed in terms of the general perspective. Firstly, it can be said that Allan’s decision making process was significantly influenced by social factors. His family members were urging him to take the safe route, while he felt that the more risky course of action was best for his family. This highlights the importance of social influences on decision making. Another factor that played a role in Allan’s decision making process was self-discrepancy theory. This theory posits that people are motivated to reduce the discrepancy between their ideal selves and their actual selves (Higgins, 1987). In this case, Alan may have been motivated to take the more risky course of action because it aligned with his ideal self. Finally, Allan’s decision making process can also be seen from a cognitive perspective. He was trying to weigh the pros and cons of each option and make the best decision for his family. This highlights the importance of careful deliberation and consideration when making decisions.

FAQ

The author was inspired to write this fictional narrative because they wanted to explore the challenges that a young person with autism faces.

Alan faces many challenges throughout the story, including making friends, dealing with bullies, and coping with his diagnosis.

Alan's family is very supportive and helps him through his challenges.

In the end, Alan overcomes his challenges by accepting himself for who he is and finding true friends who accept him as well.

The lessons that can be learned from Alan's story include acceptance, tolerance, and understanding.