The Rhetorical Analysis of the Article on Woman Terrorism
1. Introduction
In the article “Rhetorical Analysis of the Article”, the author has argued over the question of woman terrorism, its reasons and appealing to the legislative bodies. The author uses different stylistic devices and structures to persuade the reader in his/her point of view. Moreover, the author appeals to emotions and empathy while talking about women terrorists – “black widows”.
2. The author’s structure and style
The author’s structure is based on three parts:
-The first part is the introduction where the author states the problem and introduces the main characters – women terrorists or “black widows”.
-The second part is the body of the text where the author develops his/her arguments and reasons.
-The third part is the conclusion where the author sums up all the information and gives his/her final opinion on the matter.
The author’s style is persuasive. The author uses different stylistic devices to persuade the reader in his/her point of view. For example, in the beginning of the second part, the author writes: “I believe that women who have been recruited for such crimes are not fully aware of what they are doing”. With this sentence, the author wants to create an image of a victim who is not guilty in her actions. Moreover, the author uses emotional language to appeal to empathy. For instance, when talking about black widows, the author writes: “These women have lost their husbands, their fathers, their brothers”. With these words, the author tries to create an image of a suffering woman who needs help and understanding. In addition, the author uses different facts and statistics to support his/her arguments. For example, when talking about woman terrorism, the author writes: “According to a recent study by RAND Corporation, about 40 percent of all terrorist attacks between 1968 and 2007 were carried out by women”. With this sentence, the author wants to show that woman terrorism is a real problem that needs to be addressed by legislative bodies.
3. The persuasive opening of the article
The opening of the article is very persuasive. The author starts with a strong statement: “Woman terrorism is a phenomenon that has been on the rise in recent years”. With this sentence, he/she wants to show that woman terrorism is a real problem that needs to be addressed by legislative bodies. Moreover, he/she introduces the main characters of his/her text – women terrorists or “black widows”. By doing so, he/she wants to create an image of a victim who is not guilty in her actions. In addition, he/she uses emotional language to appeal to empathy. For instance, when talking about black widows, he/she writes: “These women have lost their husbands, their fathers, their brothers”. With these words, he/she tries to create an image of a suffering woman who needs help and understanding.
4. The main arguments and reasons of the author
The main arguments and reasons oftheauthor are based on different facts and statistics. For example, when talking about woman terrorism,theauthor writes: “Accordingto a recent study by RAND Corporationabout 40 percentofall terrorist attacksbetween 1968and 2007were carried out bywomen”. Withthis sentencehe / shewants tonowthatwomanterrorism is areal problem that needsto be addressedby legislative bodies. Moreover,he/she uses emotional language to appealto empathy.
5. The author’s empathy with the black widows
The author’s empathy with the black widows is seen in the way he/she talks about them. For instance, when talking about black widows, he/she writes: “These women have lost their husbands, their fathers, their brothers”. With these words, he/she tries to create an image of a suffering woman who needs help and understanding. Moreover, he/she uses emotional language to appeal to empathy. For example, when talking about the reasons why women become terrorists, he/she writes: “For many of these women, terrorism is seen as a way to exact revenge on those who have wronged them”. With these words, he/she wants to show that woman terrorists are not guilty in their actions.
6. The distortion of perception in the article
The distortion of perception can be seen in the way the author talks about woman terrorists. For example, when talking about the reasons why women become terrorists, he/she writes: “For many of these women, terrorism is seen as a way to exact revenge on those who have wronged them”. With these words, he/she wants to show that woman terrorists are not guilty in their actions. However, by using such language, the author creates a distorted view of woman terrorists. In reality, woman terrorists are often fully aware of what they are doing and they are motivated by different reasons than revenge.
7. Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be said that the author has achieved the result in arguing over the question of woman terrorism, its reasons and appealing to the legislative bodies. The author has used different stylistic devices and structures to persuade the reader in his/her point of view. Moreover, the author has appealed to emotions and empathy while talking about women terrorists – “black widows”.