The Relationship Between Whistleblowing and Critical Thinking
The purpose of this paper is to explore the connections between whistleblowing and critical thinking. In order to do so, the definitions of both concepts will be analyzed. Based on the results of the analysis, it will be possible to make a conclusion about the relationship between these two concepts.
2. What is whistleblowing?
Whistleblowing is an act of disclosing information about illegal or unethical activities that are occurring within an organization (Friedman, 2015). This information is typically disclosed to people who have the power to take action against the wrongdoing that is taking place. The motivation for disclosing this information is typically to stop the illegal or unethical activity from taking place.
There are many different types of illegal or unethical activities that can be revealed through whistleblowing. Some examples include financial fraud, corruption, health and safety violations, and environmental damage. Whistleblowers often have access to sensitive information about these activities because they are involved in them directly or because they have access to records that document them.
The act of whistleblowing can be risky for whistleblowers because they may face retaliation from the people who are committing the illegal or unethical activities. This retaliation can take many different forms, such as termination from employment, lawsuits, or physical violence. Despite the risks associated with whistleblowing, many people choose to do it because they believe that it is the right thing to do.
3. What is critical thinking?
Critical thinking is a cognitive process that includes the ability to assess information and make judgments based on that information (Paul & Elder, 2016). This process requires people to think reflectively and deeply about a given topic in order to come to a conclusion about it. In order to engage in critical thinking, people must be willing to question their own assumptions and beliefs. They must also be willing to consider different perspectives and look at evidence objectively.
There are many different applications for critical thinking. One example is in academia, where students are required to critically analyze what they are learning in order to write papers or take exams. Another example is in business, where employees need to be able to solve problems efficiently and make decisions that are in the best interests of their company. Critical thinking is also important in everyday life, as it helps people make informed decisions about their health, relationships, and finances.
Based on the definitions of "whistleblowing" and "critical thinking", it is possible to make a conclusion that these concepts have similar meanings. Both concepts involve assessing information and making judgments based on that information. The main difference between these concepts is that whistleblowers typically disclose information about illegal or unethical activities while critical thinkers can apply their skills to any topic.