Crazy writers

Free Essay Samples > Essays > ️ Law > ‍️ Criminal Law > The Pros and Cons of Parole

The Pros and Cons of Parole

1. Introduction

Parole is a system of early release from prison that has been in existence in the United States since the late 1800s. The goal of parole is to provide offenders with an opportunity to reintegrate into society and to reduce recidivism rates. In order to be eligible for parole, inmates must typically serve a certain amount of time in prison and meet certain conditions. Once released on parole, offenders are supervised by a probation or parole officer and are required to adhere to a set of rules, which may include meeting regularly with their officer, maintaining employment, abstaining from drug and alcohol use, and refraining from criminal activity. If an offender violates the conditions of their parole, they may be returned to prison.

While parole has been shown to be an effective tool for reducing recidivism rates, there is a growing body of research that suggests that it may also have negative effects on communities and individuals. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that the parole system is disproportionately applied to minority groups. As such, there is a push for reform in the way that parole is administered in the United States.

2. What is parole and how does it work?

Parole is a system of early release from prison that has been in existence in the United States since the late 1800s (Mauer, 2006). The goal of parole is to provide offenders with an opportunity to reintegrate into society and to reduce recidivism rates. In order to be eligible for parole, inmates must typically serve a certain amount of time in prison and meet certain conditions. Once released on parole, offenders are supervised by a probation or parole officer and are required to adhere to a set of rules, which may include meeting regularly with their officer, maintaining employment, abstaining from drug and alcohol use, and refraining from criminal activity. If an offender violates the conditions of their parole, they may be returned to prison (Mauer, 2006).

3. The history of parole in the United States

The origins of parole can be traced back to the Auburn System of prisoner rehabilitation, which was implemented in 1816 at the Auburn Correctional Facility in New York (Mauer, 2006). Under this system, prisoners were required to work during the day and were kept in solitary confinement at night. The thinking behind this system was that isolation would lead to reflection and contemplation, which would ultimately lead to rehabilitation (Mauer, 2006). This system was later adopted by other prisons across the United States.

In 1876, the first formalized system of parole was established in Massachusetts (Mauer, 2006). Under this system, prisoners who had served one-third of their sentence could be released on Parole upon recommendation of the prison warden (Mauer, 2006). This system quickly spread to other states across the country. By 1910, all but two states had implemented some form of parole (Mauer, 2006).

4. Why is there a push for parole reform?

There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that the current system of administering parole is flawed and that it may actually do more harm than good. Specifically, there is evidence to suggest that:

– The current system of administering parole is disproportionately applied to minority groups;
– Parole can have negative effects on communities and individuals;
– The current system of administering parole is ineffective at reducing recidivism rates.

5. How effective is parole?

The effectiveness of parole has been the subject of much debate. Some researchers have argued that parole is an effective tool for reducing recidivism rates (MacKenzie, 2006). Others have argued that parole is ineffective and that it may actually increase recidivism rates (Mauer, 2006). The research on this topic is mixed and more research is needed to determine the effectiveness of parole.

6. The negatives of parole

There are a number of potential negative effects of parole. First, parole can have a negative impact on communities. When offenders are released from prison, they often return to the same community in which they committed their crimes. This can lead to an increase in crime rates and a decrease in property values. Second, parole can have a negative impact on families. Offenders on parole are often required to adhere to strict rules, which can make it difficult for them to maintain employment and support their families. Finally, parole can have a negative effect on the individual. Offenders on parole are at risk of being returned to prison if they violate the conditions of their release. This can lead to feelings of anxiety and stress and can make it difficult for offenders to reintegrate into society.

7. The pros of parole

Despite the potential negatives, there are also a number of potential positives associated with parole. First, parole can provide offenders with an opportunity to reform and rehabilitate themselves. If offenders take advantage of the resources and support that they are provided with while on parole, they may be less likely to reoffend in the future. Second, parole can provide offenders with an opportunity to reconnect with their families and their communities. If offenders are able to establish positive relationships with their families and their communities, they may be less likely to reoffend in the future. Finally, parole can provide offenders with an opportunity to rebuild their lives. If offenders are able to find employment and housing while on parole, they may be less likely to reoffend in the future.

8. Conclusion

Parole is a system of early release from prison that has been in existence in the United States since the late 1800s. The goal of parole is to provide offenders with an opportunity to reintegrate into society and to reduce recidivism rates. While there is evidence to suggest that parole is an effective tool for reducing recidivism rates, there is also evidence to suggest that it may have negative effects on communities and individuals. As such, there is a push for reform in the way that parole is administered in the United States.

FAQ

The policy of releasing parolees from prisons is that they are released on the condition that they adhere to certain guidelines set by their parole officer. If they violate any of these conditions, they can be sent back to prison.

This policy impacts prisoners and society in a number of ways. First, it gives prisoners an incentive to behave while they are in prison, knowing that they could be released on parole if they do. Second, it allows society to keep tabs on offenders after they leave prison, making sure that they are not engaging in criminal activity. Finally, it helps to reduce overcrowding in prisons by freeing up space for other inmates.

Who benefits and who suffers from this policy depends on a number of factors. Prisoners who behave well and follow the rules set by their parole officers stand to benefit the most from this policy, as they will be the ones most likely to be released on parole. Society also benefits from this policy, as it helps to keep tabs on offenders and reduces overcrowding in prisons. However, there are also some drawbacks to this policy. For example, some criminals may view being released on parole as a “get out of jail free” card and use it as an opportunity to commit more crimes without fear of going back to prison. Additionally, those who are released on parole may find it difficult to readjust to life outside of prison and may end up committing more crimes as a result.

'It is difficult say definitively whether or not this policy is effective in reducing crime or overcrowding in prisons because there are a number of factors that play into both of these issues (e., sentencing policies, rehabilitation programs). However, one study found that states with early release policies saw a reduction in both crime rates and prison populations (Aos et al., 2001). So while there is no guarantee that this policy will have the desired effect everywhere it is implemented, there is evidence that it can be effective in some cases.'

The costs and benefits of this policy need to be weighed carefully before it is implemented. On the one hand, this policy has the potential to reduce crime and overcrowding in prisons. On the other hand, there are some risks associated with this policy, such as the possibility that offenders will use it as an opportunity to commit more crimes.

'There are a number of alternatives to this policy that could be more effective in reducing crime or overcrowding in prisons. For example, Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2015 would give judges more discretion when sentencing nonviolent offenders, which could lead to shorter prison sentences and less overcrowding (“The Sentencing Reform”). Another alternative is to provide more funding for rehabilitation programs inside of prisons, which research has shown can reduce recidivism rates (Aos et al., 2001).'

'The implications of this policy for the future of our criminal justice system are far-reaching. If this policy is successful in reducing crime and overcrowding in prisons, it could lead to a major shift in how we deal with criminals both inside and outside of prison walls. Additionally, if this policy becomes widely adopted, it could put pressure on lawmakers to pass sentencing reform legislation that would further reduce prison populations.'