The Passages of Coady’s on the Accusation of Playing God

1. Introduction

In "The Passages of Coady's on the Accusation of Playing God," Coady argues that the Church should not be too quick to accuse others of playing God. He believes that the Church itself has been guilty of this charge in its own actions and policies.

2. The accusation of playing God in the secular world

2.1. Scientific activities

Coady believes that many of the activities of the secular world can be seen as an accusation of playing God. He cites examples such as scientific research and experimentation, which can be seen as an attempt to understand and control the natural world. This is seen as a challenge to the power of God and an attempt to take His place.

2. 2. Reproduction

Another example is reproduction. Coady argues that when people use artificial means to conceive children, they are trying to take on the role of God in creating life. This is seen as an affront to His power and a challenge to His role as the ultimate creator.

2. 3. Human genetic engineering

A third example is human genetic engineering. Coady believes that by manipulating the genes of humans, we are taking on the role of God in determining how our species will evolve. This is seen as a dangerous and arrogant act that could have disastrous consequences for humanity.

3. The accusation of playing God in the Church’s doctrine

3.1 Abortion

One example of this is abortion. The Church has traditionally opposed abortion, viewing it as a form of murder. However, Coady argues that this position is hypocritical, as the Church itself has condoned other forms of killing, such as capital punishment and war. He believes that the Church should not be so quick to judge those who choices to abort their pregnancies, as they are only exercising their right to control their own bodies.

3. 2 Cloning

Another example is cloning. The Church has condemned cloning, viewing it as a form of playing God by creating life artificially. Coady argues that this position is also hypocritical, as the Church has condoned other forms of artificial reproduction, such as in vitro fertilization. He believes that cloning should be respected as a legitimate form of reproduction, and that those who choose to clone themselves should not be judged by the Church.

3. 3 Death

A third example is death. The Church has traditionally opposed euthanasia, or mercy killing, viewing it as a form of murder. However, Coady argues that this position is hypocritical, as the Church itself has condoned other forms of killing, such as capital punishment and war. He believes that those who choose to end their lives should not be judged by the Church, as they are only exercising their right to control their own bodies.

3. 4 Inquisitions

The final example is inquisitions. The Church has been accused of conducting inquisitions in order to persecute those who disagreed with its doctrines. Coady argues that this was not always the case, and that many inquisitions were actually conducted for legitimate reasons. He believes that those who were killed during inquisitions should not be automatically seen as martyrs, as their deaths may have served a greater purpose.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, Coady believes that the Church should not be too quick to accuse others of playing God. He believes that the Church itself has been guilty of this charge in its own actions and policies.

FAQ

Coady's main arguments against human enhancement are that it is unnatural, that it is playing God, and that it could lead to abuse.

I do not agree with Coady that human enhancement is playing God. I believe that if people want to enhance their bodies in order to improve their lives, they should be able to do so. However, I do think there are potential ethical implications of human enhancement that need to be considered.

Opponents of human enhancement might argue that enhancing humans would create a two-tiered society of those who can afford enhancements and those who cannot. They might also argue that human enhancement could lead to unforeseen consequences, such as unintended negative side effects or even addiction.

Some ethical implications of human enhancement include the potential for creating unequal societies and the possibility of unforeseen negative consequences.

There is potential for abuse with human enhancement technologies if they are not regulated properly. For example, people with more money could potentially buy enhancements that give them an unfair advantage over others