The Gordon Act: To Amend or Repeal?
1. Introduction
The Gordon Act is a law that was passed in order to establish a wildlife refuge in the Big Dark Swamp. The act also prohibits any building or tree-felling within the boundaries of the refuge. The act was named after its sponsor, Congressman Albert Gordon. The law was passed in response to the hunting of grackles, which are a protected species in Wayne County.
The act has been up for reauthorization several times, and is currently up for reauthorization. There are those who argue that the act should be amended in order to allow for the protection of human health, while others argue that the act should be repealed altogether.
2. The Gordon Act
The Gordon Act was passed in order to establish a wildlife refuge in the Big Dark Swamp. The act also prohibits any building or tree-felling within the boundaries of the refuge. The act was named after its sponsor, Congressman Albert Gordon. The law was passed in response to the hunting of grackles, which are a protected species in Wayne County.
The act has been up for reauthorization several times, and is currently up for reauthorization. There are those who argue that the act should be amended in order to allow for the protection of human health, while others argue that the act should be repealed altogether.
3. The Argument for the Act
There are those who argue that the act should be amended in order to allow for the protection of human health, while others argue that the act should be repealed altogether. Those who support amending the act contend that it would allow for the prohibition of mining and logging activities within the boundaries of the refuge, which would protect the air and water quality in Wayne County. Additionally, supporters argue that amending the act would also prohibit hunting within the boundaries of the refuge, which would protect humans from being exposed to lead poisoning from ammunition used by hunters.
4. The Argument Against the Act
Those who oppose amending the act contend that doing so would infringe upon the property rights of landowners within Wayne County. Additionally, opponents argue that amending the act would result in job losses within Wayne County, as many residents depend on mining and logging activities for their livelihoods. Moreover, those who oppose amending the act assert that prohibiting hunting within the boundaries of the refuge would not necessarily protect humans from being exposed to lead poisoning from ammunition used by hunters, as lead poisoning can also occur from other sources, such as drinking water contaminated with lead.
5. Conclusion
Although there are valid arguments on both sides of this issue, ultimately it is up to Congress to decide whether or not to amend the Gordon Act.