The Controlled Demolition of the WTC Buildings: Evidence and Implications

1. Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to answer the question: “Why did the WTC buildings completely collapse?”

There are many theories about the collapse of the WTC buildings, but the most plausible one is the controlled demolition hypothesis. This hypothesis states that the WTC buildings were brought down by explosives, and not by the impact of the planes and the resulting fires.

There are several pieces of evidence that support the controlled demolition hypothesis. First, the WTC buildings collapsed at nearly free-fall speed, which is impossible if they were brought down only by the impact of the planes and the resulting fires. Second, witnesses reported hearing explosions before each of the buildings collapsed. Third, there was molten metal found in the debris of the WTC buildings, which could not have been created by the fires. And finally, sulphur was found in the debris of the WTC buildings, which is a key ingredient in thermite, a type of explosive.

In conclusion, it is clear that the WTC buildings were brought down by explosives, and not by the impact of the planes and the resulting fires. The most likely explanation for this is that the buildings were rigged with thermite charges, which generated the molten metal and caused the buildings to collapse at nearly free-fall speed.

2. The Collapse of the Southwestern Corner

The first piece of evidence that supports the controlled demolition hypothesis is the collapse of the southwestern corner of the WTC building. This corner of the building collapsed at nearly free-fall speed, which is impossible if the building was brought down only by the impact of the planes and the resulting fires.

The second piece of evidence that supports the controlled demolition hypothesis is the collapse of the third WTC twin tower. This tower collapsed at nearly free-fall speed as well, which is again impossible if the building was brought down only by the impact of the planes and the resulting fires.

3. The Molten Metal

The third piece of evidence that supports the controlled demolition hypothesis is the molten metal found in the debris of the WTC buildings. This molten metal could not have been created by the fires, because fires cannot generate temperatures hot enough to melt steel. The only way to create molten metal is with explosives, such as thermite.

4. Sulphur Cartelization

The fourth piece of evidence that supports the controlled demolition hypothesis is the sulphur found in the debris of the WTC buildings. Sulphur is a key ingredient in thermite, and its presence in the debris indicates that thermite was used in the demolition of the WTC buildings.

5. The Thermite Reaction

The fifth and final piece of evidence that supports the controlled demolition hypothesis is the thermite reaction itself. When thermite reacts, it generates molten iron and has the ability to melt and evaporate steel. The presence of sulphur cartelizes the reaction, making it even more powerful.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, it is clear that the WTC buildings were brought down by explosives, and not by the impact of the planes and the resulting fires. The most likely explanation for this is that the buildings were rigged with thermite charges, which generated molten metal and caused the buildings to collapse at nearly free-fall speed.

FAQ

The WTC buildings collapsed because of the impact of the planes that hit them.

The planes caused the WTC buildings to collapse by damaging the support structures.

The WTC buildings completely collapsed because the damaged support structures could not hold up the weight of the buildings.

There was nothing that could have been done to prevent the WTC building collapses because they were caused by an external event (the plane crashes).