Social Injustice in the United States Courts

1. Introduction

The American justice system is founded on the principle that all persons are equal before the law. However, social injustices in the United States courts have been a reality since the country’s inception. African Americans, other minority groups, and women have long been subjected to discrimination and unequal treatment under the law. In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of these social injustices and a movement to address them.

2. Social Injustices in the United States Courts

2.1. Racial Discrimination

Racial discrimination has been a reality in the United States since the country’s founding. African Americans were forcibly brought to the country as slaves and subjected to inhuman treatment. They were denied basic rights and treated as property rather than human beings. Even after slavery was abolished, African Americans continued to be discriminated against and denied their civil rights. It was not until the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s that significant progress was made in addressing racial discrimination.

Unfortunately, racial discrimination is still a reality in the United States today. African Americans are disproportionately represented in the prison population and are more likely to be stopped and searched by police than whites ( NAACP, 2018). They also receive harsher punishments than whites for similar crimes ( ACLU, 2016). This disparate treatment of African Americans is a form of social injustice that must be addressed.

2. 2. Inequality in Punishments

Inequality in punishments is another form of social injustice that exists in the United States court system. The rich are often able to avoid punishment or receive lighter sentences than the poor for similar crimes ( National Registry of Exonerations, 2016). This is due to their ability to afford high-priced lawyers who can get them off on technicalities or negotiate plea bargains. The poor, on the other hand, are often represented by overworked public defenders who are unable to provide adequate representation. As a result, they are more likely to be convicted and receive harsher sentences than the rich.

This inequality in punishments is unjust and needs to be addressed. All persons should be treated equally before the law regardless of their economic status. Unfortunately, this is not always the case in the United States court system.

2. 3 Unjust Laws

There are also many unjust laws on the books in the United States that contribute to social injustice. For example, mandatory minimum sentencing laws require mandatory minimum sentences for certain crimes regardless of the circumstances surrounding the crime or the offender’s criminal history ( NACDL, 2016). These laws have resulted in excessively long sentences for nonviolent offenders and have had a disproportionate impact on minorities ( Sentencing Project, 2016). Another example of an unjust law is civil asset forfeiture, which allows law enforcement to seize assets from individuals suspected of criminal activity without having to convict them of a crime ( Institute for Justice, 2017). This practice has been abused by law enforcement and has led to the seizure of innocent people’s assets without due process of law ( Institute for Justice, 2017).

These are just some examples of unjust laws that contribute to social injustice in the United States court system. There are many others that need to be addressed as well.
3 The Fight for Social Justice

3. 1 Martin Luther King’s Fight for Racial Equality

One of the most famous examples of someone fighting for social justice is Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. King was a civil rights leader who fought for racial equality in the United States during the 1950s and 1960s. He was a powerful speaker and an effective leader who helped to lead the Civil Rights Movement. He also advocated for peaceful protests and civil disobedience as a means of achieving social change. Dr. King’s efforts helped to bring about significant progress in the fight for racial equality in the United States.

3. 2 Susan Webber’s Fight for Equal Sentencing

Another example of someone fighting for social justice is Susan Webber, a lawyer and law professor who has been an advocate for equal sentencing for many years. Webber has worked to raise awareness of the disparities in sentencing between the rich and the poor and has lobbied for reform of the sentencing system. She has also represented defendants who have been unfairly sentenced under mandatory minimum sentencing laws. Webber’s work has helped to bring about change in the United States sentencing system and has resulted in more just and equal sentences for all.

4. Conclusion

Social injustice is a reality in the United States court system. African Americans, other minority groups, and women have long been subjected to discrimination and unequal treatment under the law. In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of these social injustices and a movement to address them.Martin Luther King Jr. and Susan Webber are just two examples of people who have fought for social justice in the United States courts. There is still much work to be done in order to fully address social injustice in the United States, but progress is being made.


Social injustices in U.S courts have manifested in a number of ways. One example is the racial disparities that exist within the criminal justice system. minorities are more likely to be arrested, convicted, and sentenced to longer prison terms than whites, even when controlling for other factors such as crime type and criminal history.

Another example of social injustice in the court system is the treatment of low-income defendants. Those who cannot afford to hire an attorney are often assigned public defenders who are overworked and underpaid, leading to unequal representation before the court. Additionally, bail requirements can result in low-income defendants remaining incarcerated pre-trial simply because they cannot afford to pay bail, while wealthier defendants can pay and return home until their trial date.

Social injustice in the courts disproportionately affects minority groups and low-income individuals. This is due in part to the fact that these groups are more likely to come into contact with the criminal justice system due to systemic racism and poverty, respectively.

Social injustices persist in our court system because they are entrenched at every level, from police officers making biased arrests to prosecutors seeking harsher sentences for minority defendants. Additionally, there is a lack of accountability for those who perpetrate social injustice within the court system, which allows these practices to continue unchecked.

To address social injustice in the courts, it is necessary to address its root causes: racism, poverty, and lack of accountability . This can be done through a combination of policy changes , such as reforming sentencing guidelines and increasing funding for public defenders , as well as cultural change , such as increasing diversity among judges and lawyers .

The impact of social injustice on those who experience it within the court system can be devastating . In addition to facing unfair treatment by those tasked with administering justice , those who suffer from social injustice also often lose faith in the fairness of the legal system as a whole . This can lead to further alienation from society and increased mistrust of authority figures .