A Critical Analysis of On Being A Teacher by Stanley Kozol and Why High School Must Go by Irving Epstein

1. Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the book On Being A Teacher by Stanley Kozol and the book Why High School Must Go by Irving Epstein. In On Being A Teacher, Kozol provides a comprehensive guide on how to be an effective teacher in today’s society. In Why High School Must Go, Epstein provides a critical analysis of the contemporary state of high schools and argues that they must be reformed in order to meet the needs of today’s students.

2. On Being A Teacher by Stanley Kozol

Kozol begins his book with a discussion of the importance of teachers. He argues that teachers are the most important factor in a child’s education, and that they have the ability to inspire and motivate their students. He also discusses the challenges that teachers face in today’s society, such as large class sizes, low salaries, and lack of resources. However, he argues that these challenges can be overcome if teachers are committed to their students and are willing to work hard.

Kozol then provides a step-by-step guide on how to be an effective teacher. He begins by discussing the importance of establishing rapport with your students. He then discusses the need to create engaging and challenging lesson plans. He also discusses the importance of maintaining a positive attitude, being patient, and having high expectations for your students.

Throughout the book, Kozol provides numerous examples of effective teaching practices from his own career. He also includes interviews with other successful teachers. These interviews provide insights into the challenges and rewards of teaching.

Kozol concludes his book by discussing the future of education. He argues that education must be reformed in order to meet the needs of today’s students. He also calls for more resources to be invested in education, and for teachers to be given more support.

3. Why High School Must Go by Irving Epstein

Epstein begins his book with a discussion of the problems with high schools today. He argues that high schools are not meeting the needs of today’s students, and that they must be reformed in order to meet the demands of the 21st century.

Epstein then discusses the various ways in which high schools could be improved. He argues for smaller class sizes, more personalized instruction, and more real-world learning opportunities. He also calls for more resources to be invested in high schools, and for high school graduates to be given more support as they transition into adulthood.

Epstein concludes his book by calling for a revolution in education. He argues that education must be transformed in order to meet the needs of today’s students. He also calls for more resources to be invested in education, and for teachers to be given more support.

4. Conclusion

Kozol and Epstein provide critical analyses of the contemporary state of schools and further paths of their development. While their books contain many different ideas, they both agree that education must be reformed in order to meet the needs of today’s students. They also both call for more resources to be invested in education, and for teachers to be given more support

FAQ

The key arguments made by Kozol and Epstein in their essay are that teacher quality is the most important factor in determining student success, and that current methods of evaluating teachers are ineffective.

Kozol takes a more critical view of the current education system, while Epstein offers potential solutions to improve teacher quality.

Kozol cites research showing that students with lower-quality teachers tend to have lower test scores and graduation rates, while Epstein highlights programs that have been successful in attracting and retaining high-quality teachers.

I find Epstein's argument more convincing because it provides specific proposals for how to improve the education system, rather than simply critiquing the status quo.