A Comparison of “Pedro Paramo” by Juan Rulfo and “Gilgamesh” by Herbert Mason

1. Introduction

In this paper, I will be comparing and contrasting the works of Pedro Paramo by Juan Rulfo and Gilgamesh by Herbert Mason. I will be looking at the similarities between the two works, as well as the differences. In particular, I will be looking at how each work uses magical realism, and how each work addresses the theme of tyranny.

2. AComparison of “Pedro Paramo” by Juan Rulfo and “Gilgamesh” by Herbert Mason

2. 1 magical realism

One of the most striking similarity between Pedro Paramo and Gilgamesh is the use of magical realism. Magical realism is a genre of literature that blurs the lines between reality and fantasy. It is a genre that is often used in Latin American literature, and it is used extensively in both Pedro Paramo and Gilgamesh.

In Pedro Paramo, Juan Rulfo uses magical realism to tell the story of a man named Pedro Paramo. Pedro Paramo is a man who has died, but he still exists in some form in the town that he once ruled. The people in the town can still see him and talk to him, even though he is no longer alive. This use of magical realism allows Rulfo to explore the themes of death and memory in a way that would not be possible if he were writing in a purely realistic style.

Herbert Mason also makes use of magical realism in his work Gilgamesh. In Gilgamesh, the titular character is a man who has been dead for thousands of years. However, he still exists in some form in the world, and he can still interact with the people around him. This use of magical realism allows Mason to explore the themes of death and memory in a way that would not be possible if he were writing in a purely realistic style.

2. 2 The theme of Tyranny

Another similarity between Pedro Paramo and Gilgamesh is the theme of tyranny. Both works deal with the idea of a man who has absolute power over a group of people. In Pedro Paramo, Pedro Paramo is a man who has been dead for many years, but he still exists in some form in the town that he once ruled. The people in the town are terrified of him, and they do everything that he tells them to do. He controls them completely, and they have no choice but to obey him.

In Gilgamesh, Gilgamesh is also a man who has absolute power over a group of people. He is the king of Uruk, and he rules over his people with an iron fist. He demands complete obedience from his subjects, and they have no choice but to obey him or suffer his wrath. Like Pedro Paramo, Gilgamesh controls his people through fear and intimidation.

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, Pedro Paramo by Juan Rulfo and Gilgamesh by Herbert Mason are two works that share many similarities. Both works make use of magical realism, and both works deal with the theme of tyranny. These similarities show that both authors are interested in exploring similar themes and ideas through their writing.

FAQ

In "Pedro Paramo," tyranny is represented by the protagonist's absolute control over the town of Comala and its inhabitants. In "Gilgamesh," tyranny is represented by the titular character's abuse of power and his attempts to subdue the people of Uruk.

Pedro contributes to the theme of tyranny by using his position of power to manipulate and control those around him. Gilgamesh contributes to the theme of tyranny by abusing his power and trying to force his will on others.

Rulfo's use of magical realism heightens the sense of tyranny in "Pedro Paramo" by making it seem as though Pedro has complete control over the town and its inhabitants, even when they are not physically present.

There is some hope for escaping from tyrannical regimes, as shown in these two works, but it is often difficult and requires a great deal of courage.

These texts say that human nature is capable of both good and evil, but that tyrannical regimes often bring out the worst in people.